In the Supreme Court of the United States, James Erin McKinney, petitioner, v. Arizona, respondent : on writ of certiorari to the Arizona Supreme Court : brief for petitioner /
After a sentencing error requiring resentencing, may the state appellate court apply mitigating and aggravating circumstances to resentence, or must a jury do so?
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Corporate Authors: | , , |
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[United States] :
[publisher not identified],
[2019]
|
| Series: | Criminal justice & criminology.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | CONNECT |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | mig00005962088 | ||
| 006 | m fo d | ||
| 007 | cr bn nnnauuuu | ||
| 008 | 210501s2019 xxu obv 000 0 eng d | ||
| 005 | 20231031141607.3 | ||
| 035 | |a 1heinccn00974539 | ||
| 040 | |a NjRocCCS |b eng |e rda |c NjRocCCS | ||
| 043 | |a n-us--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a KF225.M45 |b K38 2019 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Katyal, Neal, |d 1970- |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, James Erin McKinney, petitioner, v. Arizona, respondent : |b on writ of certiorari to the Arizona Supreme Court : brief for petitioner / |c Neal Kumar Katyal, counsel of record [and 8 others], counsel for petitioner. |
| 246 | 1 | |i HeinOnline index title: |a Brief of petitioner James Erin McKinney | |
| 264 | 1 | |a [United States] : |b [publisher not identified], |c [2019] | |
| 264 | 2 | |a [Getzville, New York] : |b William S. Hein & Company, |c [2021] | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (viii, 49 pages). | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a HeinOnline criminal justice & criminology | |
| 590 | |a Cassidy Cataloguing Services, Inc. | ||
| 500 | |a "No. 18-1109." | ||
| 500 | |a "August 2019." | ||
| 504 | |a "Table of authorities"--Pages iii-viii. | ||
| 520 | |a After a sentencing error requiring resentencing, may the state appellate court apply mitigating and aggravating circumstances to resentence, or must a jury do so? | ||
| 588 | |a Description based on PDF title page, viewed May 1, 2021. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Retroactive judicial decisions |z United States |v Cases. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Capital punishment |z United States |x States |v Cases. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Sentences (Criminal procedure) |z United States |v Cases. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Extenuating circumstances |z United States |v Cases. | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Records and briefs. |2 lcgft | |
| 700 | 1 | |a McKinney, James Erin, |e petitioner. | |
| 710 | 1 | |a Arizona, |e respondent. | |
| 710 | 1 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court. | |
| 710 | 1 | |a Arizona. |b Supreme Court. | |
| 730 | 0 | |a HeinOnline Records | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Criminal justice & criminology. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 HeinOnline Criminal Justice & Criminology |u https://ezproxy.mtsu.edu/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.preview/supctlpz0001&id=1&size=2&collection=agopinions&index=alpha/B_agopinions |z CONNECT |t 0 |
| 907 | |a 5418161 |b 06-11-21 |c 06-11-21 | ||
| 998 | |a wi |b 06-11-21 |c m |d z |e - |f eng |g xxu |h 0 |i 1 | ||
| 999 | f | f | |i 72ffe847-e913-4a52-b771-d0fd68f2724b |s 0b9490ec-6ae4-414b-b588-9bb61e00e6cb |t 0 |
| 952 | f | f | |a Middle Tennessee State University |b Main |c James E. Walker Library |d Electronic Resources |t 0 |e KF225.M45 K38 2019 |h Library of Congress classification |
