In the Supreme Court of the United States, Sharonell Fulton, et al., petitioners, v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al., respondents : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit : brief of amici curiae former foster children and foster/adoptive parents and the Catholic Association Foundation in support of petitioners /
At issue is whether free exercise plaintiffs can only succeed by proving a particular type of discrimination claim - namely that the government would allow the same conduct by someone who held different religious views - as two circuits have held, or whether courts must consider other evidence that...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Corporate Authors: | , , , |
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cincinnatti, OH ; Washington, D.C. :
Becker Gallagher,
[2020]
|
| Series: | Religion and the law.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | CONNECT |
| Summary: | At issue is whether free exercise plaintiffs can only succeed by proving a particular type of discrimination claim - namely that the government would allow the same conduct by someone who held different religious views - as two circuits have held, or whether courts must consider other evidence that a law is not neutral and generally applicable, as six circuits have held; (2) whether Employment Division v. Smith should be revisited; and (3) whether the government violates the First Amendment by conditioning a religious agency's ability to participate in the foster care system on taking actions and making statements that directly contradict the agency's religious beliefs. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | "No. 19-123." |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (vi, 34 pages). |
| Bibliography: | "Table of authorities": Pages iii -vi. |
