Mass media and the Supreme Court : the legacy of the Warren years /

Mass media and the Supreme Court : the legacy of the Warren years /

Show other versions (3)
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: United States. Supreme Court
Other Authors: Devol, Kenneth S.
Format: Book
Language:English
Published: Mamaroneck, N.Y. : Hastings House, ©1990.
Edition:4th ed.
Series:Communication arts books.
Subjects:
Press law > United States > Cases.
Telecommunication > Law and legislation > United States > Cases.
Freedom of the press > United States > Cases.

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000Ja 4500
001 mig00004737075
003 OCoLC
005 20150414124818.0
008 950110s1990 nyu v 001 0 eng c
010 |a  95102360 
019 |a 22362648 
020 |a 0803893051  |q (pbk.) 
020 |a 9780803893054  |q (pbk.) 
035 |a (OCoLC)31900303  |z (OCoLC)22362648 
035 0 0 |a ocm31900303 
040 |a MoSU-L  |b eng  |c SLU  |d OCLCQ  |d BTCTA  |d BAKER  |d YDXCP  |d CPA  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d HAC  |d OCLCO  |d TXM 
042 |a lcnccp 
043 |a n-us--- 
049 |a TXMM 
050 1 4 |a KF2750.A7  |b M37 1990 
082 4 |a 343.099  |b M 1 
092 |a 343.73  |b D49m 1990 
245 0 0 |a Mass media and the Supreme Court :  |b the legacy of the Warren years /  |c edited with commentaries and special notes, by Kenneth S. Devol. 
250 |a 4th ed. 
260 |a Mamaroneck, N.Y. :  |b Hastings House,  |c ©1990. 
300 |a xiv, 450 pages ;  |c 24 cm. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Communication arts books 
500 |a Excerpts from opinions of the Supreme Court, with concurrences and dissents, and articles from various journals of law and mass communication. 
500 |a Includes index. 
505 0 0 |g 1.  |t THE JUSTICES AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT.  |t Schenck v. United States  |g (1919) --  |t Dennis v. United States  |g (1951) --  |t Virginia Board of Pharmacy v. Consumer Council  |g (1976) --  |t New York v. Ferber  |g (1982) --  |t Posadas de Puerto Rico v. Tourism Co.  |g (1986) /  |r John P. MacKenzie --  |t The Supreme Court and the Press /  |r Harry Kalven, Jr. --  |t Uninhibited, Robust and Wide Open /  |r C. David Rambo --  |t Litigious age gives rise to media law;  |g 2.  |t PRIOR RESTRAINT.  |t Near v. Minnesota  |g (1931) --  |t Lovell v. Griffin  |g (1938) --  |t Mills v. Alabama  |g (1966) --  |t New York Times v. United States  |g (1971) --  |t Pittsburgh Press v. Pittsburgh Commission  |g (1973) --  |t Cox Broadcasting v. Cohn  |g (1975) --  |t Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart  |g (1976)  |t Landmark Communications v. Virginia  |g (1978) --  |t Metromedia v. San Diego  |g (1981) --  |t Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier  |g (1988) /  |r Jack C. Landau --  |t Free at last, at least /  |r Zechariah Chafee, Jr. --  |t Freedom of speech as I see it ;  |g 3.  |t NEWSGATHERING.  |t Branzburg v. Hayes  |g (1972) --  |t Zurcher v. Standford Daily  |g (1978) --  |t Houchins v. KQED  |g (1978) --  |t Smith v. Daily Mail  |g (1979) --  |t Herbert v. Lando  |g (1979) --  |t Gannett v. DePasquale  |g (1979) --  |t Snepp v. United States  |g (1980) --  |t Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court  |g (1982) --  |t Press-Enterprise v. Superior court  |g (1984) --  |t Waller v. Georgia  |g (1984) --  |t Press-Enterprise v. Superior Court  |g (1986) / William J. Brennan, Jr. --  |t The press and the courts ;  |g 4.  |t GOVERNMENT REGULATION.  |t NBC v. United States  |g (1943) --  |t Hannegan v. Esquire  |g (1946) --  |t Lamont v. Postmaster General  |g (1965) --  |t Rowan v. Post Office  |g (1970) --  |t FCC v. Pacifica Foundation  |g (1978) --  |t Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios  |g (1984) --  |t Harper & Row v. Nation  |g (1985) /  |r William S. Paley --  |t Broadcast Journalism: at the crossroads of freedom /  |r Martin Esslin --  |t American television: purveyor of daydreams ; 
505 0 0 |g 5.  |t PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE MEDIA.  |t Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC  |g (1969) --  |t CBS v. Democratic National Committee  |g (1973) --  |t Bigelow v. Virginia  |g (1975) --  |t Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo  |g (1974) --  |t CBS v. FCC  |g (1981) ;  |g 6.  |t OBSCENITY DEFINED.  |t Kingsley Books v. Brown  |g (1957) --  |t Roth v. United States  |g (1957) /  |r The U.S. Commission on Obscenity and Pornography (1970) --  |t Recommendations /  |r Robert Yoakum --  |t The great smut hunt ;  |g 7.  |t OBSCENITY REDEFINED.  |t Bantam Books v. Sullivan  |g (1963) --  |t Memoirs v. Massachusetts  |g (1966) --  |t Ginzburg v. United States  |g (1966) --  |t Ginsberg v. New York  |g (1968) --  |t Stanley v. Georgia  |g (1969) --  |t United States v. Reidel  |g (1971) --  |t Miller v. California  |g (1973)  |t Young v. American Mini Theatres  |g (1976) --  |t Renton v. Playtime  |g (1986) /  |r Burt Pines --  |t The obscenity quagmire ;  |g 8.  |t MOTION PICTURE CENSORSHIP.  |t Burstyn v. Wilson  |g (1952) --  |t Kingsley Pictures v. Regents  |g (1959) --  |t Times Film Corp. v. Chicago  |g (1961) --  |t Freedman v. Maryland  |g (1965) --  |t Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton  |g (1973) --  |t Jenkins v. Georgia  |g (1974) --  |t Erznoznik v. Jacksonville  |g (1975) /  |r Louis Henkin --  |t Morals and the Constitution /  |r Harry Clor --  |t Public morality and free expression ; 
505 0 0 |g 9.  |t LIBEL.  |t New York Times v. Sullivan  |g (1964) --  |t Garrison v. Louisiana  |g (1964) --  |t Curtis v. Butts  |g (1967) --  |t Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.  |g (1974) --  |t Time, Inc. v. Firestone  |g (1976) --  |t Hutchinson v. Proxmire  |g (1979) --  |t Wolston v. Reader's Digest  |g (1979) --  |t Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union  |g (1984) --  |t Philadelphia Newspapers v. hepps  |g (1986) --  |t Anderson v. Liberty Lobby  |g (1986) --  |t Hustler Magazine v. Falwell  |g (1988) /  |r Jerome Lawrence Merin --  |t Libel and the Supreme Court ;  |g 10.  |t RIGHT OF PRIVACY.  |t Time, Inc. v. Hill  |g (1967) --  |t Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co.  |g (1974) --  |t Zacchini v. Scripps Howard Broadcasting  |g (1977) --  |t Florida Star v. B.J.F.  |g (1989) /  |r Donald L. Smith --  |t Privacy: the right that failed /  |r Arthur r. Miller --  |t A right to know v. A right of privacy ;  |g 11.  |t TRIAL BY NEWSPAPER.  |t Bridges v. California  |g (1941) --  |t Irvin v. Doud  |g (1961) --  |t Sheppard v. Maxwell  |g (1966) --  |t Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia  |g (1980) /  |r Fred P. Graham --  |t "Gag" orders leave a quagmire /  |r Reuven Frank --  |t The lawyer's adversary system ;  |g 12.  |t TRIAL BY TELEVISION.  |t Rideau v. Louisiana  |g (1963) --  |t Estes v. Texas  |g (1965) --  |t Chandler v. Florida  |g (1981) /  |r Talbot D'Alemberte --  |t Let the sunshine in /  |r George Gerbner --  |t Are we at the point of no return? /  |r The Warren Commission Report (1964) --  |t Responsibility of news media ;  |t APPENDICES.  |g I.  |t Amendments to the United States Constitution --  |g II.  |t Justices of the United States Supreme Court --  |g III.  |t Glossary of Major Legal Terms. 
590 |a First Amendment Center Collection. 
650 0 |a Press law  |z United States  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Telecommunication  |x Law and legislation  |z United States  |v Cases. 
650 0 |a Freedom of the press  |z United States  |v Cases. 
700 1 |a Devol, Kenneth S. 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Supreme Court. 
830 0 |a Communication arts books. 
907 |a 3103232  |b 04-14-15  |c 04-14-15 
998 |a w  |b 04-14-15  |c m  |d a   |e -  |f eng  |g nyu  |h 0  |i 1 
994 |a C0  |b TXM 
945 |a 343.73  |b D49m 1990   |g 1  |i 33082017415075  |j 0  |l w3   |o -  |p $0.00  |q -  |r -  |s -   |t 0  |u 0  |v 0  |w 0  |x 0  |y .i21009041  |z 04-14-15 
999 f f |i f43f3d8a-4055-45c2-966e-30a511472b48  |s 6b888714-8bb0-4a00-b0da-e11c8d7bfe51  |t 0 
952 f f |p Circulating  |a Middle Tennessee State University  |b Main  |c James E. Walker Library  |d Main Collection - Walker Library - 3rd Floor  |t 0  |e 343.73 D49m 1990  |h Library of Congress classification  |i Book  |m 33082017415075  |n 1 

Similar Items