The slaveholding crisis : fear of insurrection and the coming of the Civil War /

In December 1860, South Carolinians voted to abandon the Union, sparking the deadliest war in American history. Led by a proslavery movement that viewed Abraham Lincoln's place at the helm of the federal government as a real and present danger to the security of the South, southerners'both...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paulus, Carl Lawrence, 1983- (Author)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Baton Rouge : Louisiana State University Press, [2017]
Series:Conflicting worlds, new dimensions of the American Civil War
Subjects:
Online Access:CONNECT

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 in00006265295
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 161205s2017 lau ob 001 0 eng d
005 20230822134812.8
019 |a 965474706  |a 965740211  |a 966256504  |a 966872815  |a 967577402  |a 967857767 
020 |a 9780807164365  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0807164364  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 9780807164358 
020 |z 0807164356 
020 |z 9780807164372  |q (epub) 
020 |z 9780807164389  |q (mobi) 
035 |a 1WRLDSHRocn965196485 
035 |a (OCoLC)965196485  |z (OCoLC)965474706  |z (OCoLC)965740211  |z (OCoLC)966256504  |z (OCoLC)966872815  |z (OCoLC)967577402  |z (OCoLC)967857767 
040 |a N$T  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c N$T  |d YDX  |d EBLCP  |d P@U  |d CCO  |d IDB  |d VLB  |d OCL  |d OTZ  |d IOG  |d MERUC  |d RRP  |d JBG  |d OCLCQ  |d RECBK  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCL  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCA  |d OCL 
043 |a n-us--- 
049 |a TXMM 
050 4 |a E440.5  |b .P35 2017eb 
082 0 4 |a 326/.80973  |2 23 
100 1 |a Paulus, Carl Lawrence,  |d 1983-  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The slaveholding crisis :  |b fear of insurrection and the coming of the Civil War /  |c Carl Lawrence Paulus. 
264 1 |a Baton Rouge :  |b Louisiana State University Press,  |c [2017] 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Conflicting worlds, new dimensions of the American Civil War 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
505 0 |a Introduction: expectations and exceptionalism -- The Haitian Revolution and slaveholding anxiety -- "Fanaticism" and southern fears of black rebellion -- Atlantic abolitionism and American exceptionalism -- Proslavery fear and the rise of the abolitionist power -- Texas annexation and the proslavery promise -- Wilmot's Proviso and the slaveholding crisis -- The proslavery turn against American exceptionalism -- Epilogue: Fighting over exceptionalism. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
520 |a In December 1860, South Carolinians voted to abandon the Union, sparking the deadliest war in American history. Led by a proslavery movement that viewed Abraham Lincoln's place at the helm of the federal government as a real and present danger to the security of the South, southerners'both slaveholders and nonslaveholders'willingly risked civil war by seceding from the United States. Radical proslavery activists contended that without defending slavery's westward expansion American planters would, like their former counterparts in the West Indies, become greatly outnumbered by those they enslaved. The result would transform the South into a mere colony within the federal government and make white southerners reliant on antislavery outsiders for protection of their personal safety and wealth. Faith in American exceptionalism played an important role in the reasoning of the antebellum American public, shaping how those in both the free and slave states viewed the world. Questions about who might share the bounty of the exceptional nature of the country became the battleground over which Americans fought, first with words, then with guns. Carl Lawrence Paulus's The Slaveholding Crisis examines how, due to the fear of insurrection by the enslaved, southerners created their own version of American exceptionalism'one that placed the perpetuation of slavery at its forefront. Feeling a loss of power in the years before the Civil War, the planter elite no longer saw the Union, as a whole, fulfilling that vision of exceptionalism. As a result, Paulus contends, slaveholders and nonslaveholding southerners believed that the white South could anticipate racial conflict and brutal warfare. This narrative postulated that limiting slavery's expansion within the Union was a riskier proposition than fighting a war of secession. In the end, Paulus argues, by insisting that the new party in control of the federal government promoted this very insurrection, the planter elite gained enough popular support to create the Confederate States of America. In doing so, they established a thoroughly proslavery, modern state with the military capability to quell massive resistance by the enslaved, expand its territorial borders, and war against the forces of the Atlantic antislavery movement. 
500 |a Project MUSE Universal EBA Ebooks  |5 TMurS 
651 0 |a United States  |x Politics and government  |y 1857-1861. 
650 0 |a Slavery  |z United States  |x History  |y 19th century. 
650 0 |a Slave rebellions  |x History  |y 19th century. 
650 0 |a Antislavery movements  |x History  |y 19th century. 
650 0 |a Exceptionalism  |z United States. 
648 7 |a 1800-1899  |2 fast 
655 7 |a Instructional and educational works.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01919931 
655 7 |a History.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01411628 
655 7 |a Instructional and educational works.  |2 lcgft 
730 0 |a WORLDSHARE SUB RECORDS 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Paulus, Carl Lawrence, 1983-  |t Slaveholding crisis.  |d Baton Rouge : Louisiana State University Press, [2017]  |z 9780807164358  |w (DLC) 2016012830  |w (OCoLC)945641336 
856 4 0 |u https://ezproxy.mtsu.edu/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/book/49220  |z CONNECT  |3 Project MUSE  |t 0 
949 |a ho0 
994 |a 92  |b TXM 
998 |a wi  |d z 
999 f f |s a3a2fe92-077e-41fd-8b5b-fc729cf3bcf1  |i 0ef73a3a-bd07-4358-ac9c-7f77b495d898  |t 0 
952 f f |a Middle Tennessee State University  |b Main  |c James E. Walker Library  |d Electronic Resources  |t 0  |e E440.5 .P35 2017eb  |h Library of Congress classification