Army drawdown and restructuring : background and issues for Congress [February 18, 2014] /

On January 26, 2012, senior DOD leadership unveiled a new defense strategy based on a review of potential future security challenges, current defense strategy, and budgetary constraints. This new strategy envisions a smaller, leaner Army that is agile, flexible, rapidly deployable, and technological...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Feickert, Andrew (Author)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [Washington, District of Columbia] : Congressional Research Service, [2014]
Series:CRS report for Congress ; R42493.
U.S. Congressional documents.
Military and government.
Subjects:
Online Access:CONNECT
CONNECT

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 in00006236309
006 m fo d f
007 cr bn nnnauuuu
008 160104s2014 dcu ob f000 0 eng d
005 20240207160713.1
035 |a 1heinccn00651027 
040 |a NjRocCCS  |b eng  |e rda  |c NjRocCCS 
043 |a n-us--- 
050 4 |a Z663.6  |b .A769 2014a 
100 1 |a Feickert, Andrew,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Army drawdown and restructuring :  |b background and issues for Congress [February 18, 2014] /  |c Andrew Feickert. 
264 1 |a [Washington, District of Columbia] :  |b Congressional Research Service,  |c [2014] 
264 2 |a [Getzville, New York] :  |b William S. Hein & Company,  |c [2015] 
300 |a 1 online resource (29 pages). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a CRS report ;  |v R42493 
490 1 |a HeinOnline U.S. Congressional documents 
490 1 |a HeinOnline military and government 
590 |a Cassidy Cataloguing Services, Inc. 
500 |a Cassidy Cataloguing Services, Inc.  |5 TMurS 
588 |a Description based on PDF title page, viewed January 4, 2016. 
500 |a "February 18, 2014." 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references. 
505 0 |a Importance to Congress -- The Administration's decision to drawdown and restructure the Army -- Background -- President's FY2013 budget request -- Brief history of past Army drawdowns -- The current drawdown and restructuring -- Force reduction and force-shaping programs -- Strategic implications -- Potential impact on major Army weapon systems programs -- Potential budgetary implications -- Potential issues for Congress. 
520 |a On January 26, 2012, senior DOD leadership unveiled a new defense strategy based on a review of potential future security challenges, current defense strategy, and budgetary constraints. This new strategy envisions a smaller, leaner Army that is agile, flexible, rapidly deployable, and technologically advanced. This strategy will rebalance the Army's global posture and presence, emphasizing where potential problems are likely to arise, such as the Asia-Pacific region and the Middle East. As part of the Administration's proposal, two heavy brigade combat teams (HBCTs) in Europe will be eliminated out of a total of eight BCTs that will be cut from Active Army force structure. The Army has stated that it may cut more than eight BCTs. Army endstrength will go from 570K in 2010 to 490K during the Future Year Defense Plan (FYDP) period. As part of this reduction, the Army would no longer be sized to conduct large-scale, protracted stability operations but would continue to be a full-spectrum force capable of addressing a wide range of national security challenges. The Army National Guard and Army Reserves were not targeted for significant cuts. Army leadership stated the impending decrease in Active Duty Army force structure would place an even greater reliance on the National Guard and Reserves. There will likely be a human dimension of the Army's drawdown. Troops have received an unprecedented level of support from the American public, and those soldiers leaving the service -- voluntarily and perhaps involuntarily -- might have strong personal feelings about leaving the Army and their comrades after multiple deployments to combat zones. The Army drawdown will likely be achieved in large degree by controlling accessions (i.e., the number of people allowed to join the Army). If limiting accessions is not enough to achieve the desired endstrength targets, the Army can employ a variety of involuntary and voluntary drawdown tools authorized by Congress, such as Selective Early Retirement Boards (SERBs) and Reduction-in-Force (RIF). Voluntary tools that the Army might use include the Voluntary Retirement Incentive, the Voluntary Separation Incentive, Special Separation Bonuses, Temporary Early Retirement Authority, the Voluntary Early Release/Retirement Program, and Early Outs. The Administration's proposals to drawdown and restructure the Army have a number of strategic implications. These implications include the capability to conduct stability and counterinsurgency operations, the ability to fight two simultaneous wars, shifting strategic emphasis to the Asia-Pacific region, and how the Army will maintain presence in the Middle East. Other related concerns include reducing Army presence in Europe and the Army's role in the rest of the world. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Army  |x Reorganization. 
610 1 0 |a United States.  |b Army  |x Personnel management. 
650 0 |a Military planning  |z United States. 
655 7 |a Legislative materials.  |2 lcgft 
710 2 |a Library of Congress.  |b Congressional Research Service,  |e issuing body. 
730 0 |a HeinOnline Records 
830 0 |a CRS report for Congress ;  |v R42493. 
830 0 |a U.S. Congressional documents. 
830 0 |a Military and government. 
856 4 0 |3 HeinOnline U.S. Congressional Documents Collection  |u https://ezproxy.mtsu.edu/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.crs/crsmthaacxf0001&id=1&size=2&collection=congrec&index=alpha/A_crs  |z CONNECT  |t 0 
856 4 0 |3 HeinOnline Military and Government  |u https://ezproxy.mtsu.edu/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=crs/crsmthaacxf&collection=milandgov  |z CONNECT 
949 |a ho0 
997 |a ©2016 Cassidy Cataloguing Services, Inc. 
998 |a wi  |d z 
999 f f |s f225c2d0-2311-4905-982e-f121190d8dfe  |i ab37593f-17ef-451f-8d27-3fd7ea36e1d6  |t 0 
952 f f |a Middle Tennessee State University  |b Main  |c James E. Walker Library  |d Electronic Resources  |t 0  |e Z663.6 .A769 2014a  |h Library of Congress classification