Lawful by design : measuring procedural justice in global governance /

In recent years, the procedural rules of global governance institutions have come under scrutiny from scholars worldwide and have been conceptualized as akin to domestic administrative law. However, one question has so far not been addressed: who shapes this procedure and why? In the present work, I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lischewski, Isabel (Author)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2022.
Subjects:
Online Access:CONNECT
CONNECT
LEADER 02931nam a2200445 i 4500
001 in00006045923
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 210114s2022||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
005 20220329155830.2
020 |a 9781009039529 (ebook) 
020 |z 9781316510728 (hardback) 
020 |z 9781009017985 (paperback) 
035 |a 1CAMEBACR9781009039529 
040 |a UkCbUP  |b eng  |e rda  |c UkCbUP 
050 0 0 |a KZ4850  |b .L57 2022 
082 0 0 |a 341.2  |2 23 
100 1 |a Lischewski, Isabel,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Lawful by design :  |b measuring procedural justice in global governance /  |c Isabel Lischewski. 
264 1 |a Cambridge :  |b Cambridge University Press,  |c 2022. 
300 |a 1 online resource (xiv, 192 pages) :  |b digital, PDF file(s). 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 13 Jan 2022). 
505 0 |a Introduction -- Theoretic background and methodology -- Analyzing the data -- Designed to serve but destined to fail? : conclusions and the way forward. 
520 |a In recent years, the procedural rules of global governance institutions have come under scrutiny from scholars worldwide and have been conceptualized as akin to domestic administrative law. However, one question has so far not been addressed: who shapes this procedure and why? In the present work, Isabel Lischewski develops a simple matrix connecting procedure and state interest. When this matrix is applied to a sample of forty diverse institutions, fascinating patterns emerge, which are further explored through in-depth case studies. It is shown that states prefer to balance sovereignty preservation through procedure with the costs it entails. Thus, normative considerations are not the predominant basis on which this procedure is designed. The research provides original insights into the landscape of global governance procedure and cautions against a notion of "apolitical" administration law. 
650 0 |a International agencies  |x Law and legislation. 
650 0 |a Government accountability. 
650 0 |a Abuse of administrative power. 
650 0 |a Administrative discretion. 
650 0 |a Administrative law  |x Philosophy. 
730 0 |a Cambridge EBA Collection 
776 0 8 |i Print version:   |z 9781316510728 
856 4 0 |u https://ezproxy.mtsu.edu/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009039529  |z CONNECT  |3 Cambridge University Press  |t 0 
949 |a ho0 
998 |a wi  |d z 
999 f f |s 9e7ada30-4376-4c51-be3f-c8032e12473e  |i 8aaf93c6-30c3-4cd3-86d9-96889f64f94f  |t 0 
952 f f |a Middle Tennessee State University  |b Main  |c James E. Walker Library  |d Electronic Resources  |t 1  |e KZ4850 .L57 2022  |h Library of Congress classification 
856 4 0 |3 Cambridge University Press  |t 0  |u https://ezproxy.mtsu.edu/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009039529  |z CONNECT