In the Supreme Court of the United States, Donald J. Trump, et al, petitioners, v. Mazars USA, LLP, et al., respondents : Donald J. Trump, et al., petitioners, v. Deutsche Bank AG, et al., respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia and Second Circuits : brief of Niskanen Center, Republican Women for Progress, Bill Weld, et al. as amicus curiae in support of respondents /
The question presented is whether the Constitution prohibits subpoenas issued by a county prosecutor to the sitting president's accounting firms and banks for non-privileged financial records of the president and his businesses.
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Corporate Authors: | , , , , , , |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Electronic eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States :
[publisher not identified],
[2020]
|
Series: | Executive privilege.
Women and the law. |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | CONNECT CONNECT |
Summary: | The question presented is whether the Constitution prohibits subpoenas issued by a county prosecutor to the sitting president's accounting firms and banks for non-privileged financial records of the president and his businesses. |
---|---|
Item Description: | "Nos. 19-715 & 19-760." "March 2020"--Page 18. |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (iv, 18 pages). |
Bibliography: | "Table of authorities": Pages ii-iv. |