Literature and film /

A lucid and straightforward analysis that argues that film and literature are not the entirely different, antithetical disciplines they have been and are widely held to be. Mr. Richardson shows clearly the relationship of film to literature, outlining differences as well as similarities, and common...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richardson, Robert D., 1934-2020 (Author)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Bloomington, Indiana University Press [1969]
Subjects:
Online Access:CONNECT

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000 i 4500
001 in00006205567
006 m o d
007 cr bn||||||abp
007 cr bn||||||ada
008 100323t19691969inu ob 001 0 eng d
005 20230824153555.3
019 |a 301100349  |a 1150248033  |a 1259584447  |a 1261043773  |a 1261385518  |a 1280152625  |a 1280255715 
020 |a 9780253049063  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0253049067  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 0253148456 
020 |z 9780253148452 
035 |a 1WRLDSHRocn568719244 
035 |a (OCoLC)568719244  |z (OCoLC)301100349  |z (OCoLC)1150248033  |z (OCoLC)1259584447  |z (OCoLC)1261043773  |z (OCoLC)1261385518  |z (OCoLC)1280152625  |z (OCoLC)1280255715 
040 |a OCLCE  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c OCLCE  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d INARC  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCA  |d CLU  |d P@U  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d CUS  |d OCLCO  |d IUL  |d OCLCQ  |d YWS  |d OCLCQ  |d SFB  |d OCLCQ  |d DXU 
042 |a dlr 
049 |a TXMM 
050 4 |a PN1995.3  |b .R5 
082 0 4 |a 791.43/01 
100 1 |a Richardson, Robert D.,  |d 1934-2020,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Literature and film /  |c Robert Richardson. 
264 1 |a Bloomington,  |b Indiana University Press  |c [1969] 
264 4 |c ©1969 
300 |a 1 online resource (ix, 149 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and index. 
588 0 |a Print version record. 
520 |a A lucid and straightforward analysis that argues that film and literature are not the entirely different, antithetical disciplines they have been and are widely held to be. Mr. Richardson shows clearly the relationship of film to literature, outlining differences as well as similarities, and common goals as well as divergent aims appropriate to the two arts. He demonstrates how each form and its associated criticism is frequently able to illuminate and enliven the other. A film consciousness sharpens the reader's alertness to the visual and aural qualities that mark much great writing, and literary training, in turn, adds depth and perspective to appreciation of film. The author goes on to present some of the literary influences that have affected film during its development, and discusses the impact of film on modern literature. He concludes with an extended exploration of the relationship of film to poetry, suggesting that while the two forms use similar techniques, film has dealt more significantly with the problem of how to find a humane, noncoercive order in life. 
500 |a Project Muse Open Access Books  |5 TMurS 
650 0 |a Motion pictures and literature. 
730 0 |a WORLDSHARE SUB RECORDS 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |a Richardson, Robert D., 1934-  |t Literature and film.  |d Bloomington, Indiana University Press [1969]  |w (DLC) 72085098  |w (OCoLC)27314 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/book/84767  |z CONNECT  |3 Project MUSE  |t 0 
949 |a ho0 
994 |a 92  |b TXM 
998 |a wi  |d z 
999 f f |s 6344f929-ff39-435c-940b-887417464e85  |i 088def9c-6851-4fbd-b8b7-110790d0b606  |t 0 
952 f f |a Middle Tennessee State University  |b Main  |c James E. Walker Library  |d Electronic Resources  |t 0  |e PN1995.3 .R5  |h Library of Congress classification